August 11, 2022

After months of anticipation, the brand new season of the Premier League is lastly set to start this weekend, with Crystal Palace kicking issues off in opposition to Arsenal on 5 August.

Forward of the brand new season, Ofcom has revealed the surprising scale of non-public assaults suffered by footballers day-after-day on Twitter.

In line with Ofcom’s newest report, Premier League footballers acquired 60,000 abusive Twitter messages within the first half of final season.

Half of these tweets had been directed at simply 12 gamers, together with Cristiano Ronaldo, Harry Maguire, and Marcus Rashford.

‘These findings make clear a darkish aspect to the attractive recreation,’ mentioned Kevin Bakhurst, Ofcom’s Group Director for Broadcasting and On-line Content material.

‘On-line abuse has no place in sport, nor in wider society, and tackling it requires a crew effort.’

In line with Ofcom’s newest report, Premier League footballers acquired 60,000 abusive Twitter messages within the first half of final season

Half of the abusive tweets were directed at just 12 players, including Cristiano Ronaldo (pictured), Harry Maguire, and Marcus Rashford

Half of the abusive tweets had been directed at simply 12 gamers, together with Cristiano Ronaldo (pictured), Harry Maguire, and Marcus Rashford

Premier League gamers who acquired essentially the most abusive tweets 
Participant  Complete variety of abusive tweets  % of tweets that are abusive  Membership
Bruno Fernandes 2,464  3%  Manchester United
Cristiano Ronaldo  12,520  2.2%  Manchester United 
David de Gea 1,394  2.1%  Manchester United 
Frederico Rodrigues Santos 1,924  7.6%  Manchester United 
Harry Kane 2,127  5.3%  Tottenham Hotspur 
Harry Maguire  8,954  14.9%  Manchester United 
Jack Grealish 1,538  4.4%  Manchester Metropolis 
Jesse Lingard  1,605  3.2%  Manchester United 
Marchus Rashford 2,557  2.6%  Manchester United 
Paul Pogba 1,446  3.3%  Manchester United 

Footballers are sometimes topic to vile abuse on-line.

For instance, within the wake of England’s Euro 2020 remaining defeat, England gamers Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Saka had been racially abused after lacking penalties. 

Twitter mentioned it had recognized and eliminated 1,622 tweets in the course of the remaining and within the 24 hours after the sport – rising to 1,961 three days after the sport.

Nonetheless, till now, the continued extent of on-line abuse directed at footballers has remained unclear.  

Ofcom, which is making ready to control tech giants underneath new On-line Security legal guidelines, commissioned The Alan Turing, which used machine studying to analyse greater than 2.3 million tweets directed at Premier League footballers over the primary 5 months of final season.

See also  James Webb astronomer says telescope will unlock key thriller of the universe

A crew of consultants additionally manually reviewed a random pattern of three,000 tweets.

The tweets had been assigned to one in every of 4 classes – Impartial, Optimistic, Crucial or Abusive.

An abusive tweet was outlined as a tweet that ‘threatens, insults, derogates, dehumanises, mocks or belittles a participant.’

‘This may be implicit or specific, and contains assaults in opposition to their identification. We embrace use of slurs, destructive stereotypes and extreme use of profanities,’ Ofcom defined.

The handbook evaluation revealed that 57 per cent of tweets in direction of gamers had been constructive, 27 per cent had been impartial, 12.5 per cent had been important, and three.5 per cent had been abusive. 

Equally, the machine-learning evaluation of all 2.3 million tweets indicated that 2.6 per cent contained abuse.

Harry Maguire (pictured) received the largest percentage of abusive tweets (14.9 per cent), followed by Frederico Rodrigues Santos (7.60 per cent) and Harry Kane (5.3 per cent)

Harry Maguire (pictured) acquired the biggest share of abusive tweets (14.9 per cent), adopted by Frederico Rodrigues Santos (7.60 per cent) and Harry Kane (5.3 per cent)

Marcus Rashford received 2,557 abusive tweets in the first five months of last season, according to Ofcom's report

Marcus Rashford acquired 2,557 abusive tweets within the first 5 months of final season, in accordance with Ofcom’s report

When did abuse peak? 

The most important variety of abusive tweets (3,961) had been despatched on 27 August 2021, when Cristiano Ronaldo was transfered from Juventus to Manchester United.

The second largest variety of abusive tweets (2,903) got here on 7 November when Harry Maguire apologised for Manchester United’s efficiency. 

‘The abuse was triggered by a tweet from Harry Maguire by which he apologised for Manchester United’s efficiency, saying that they had been going by means of “a tough interval”’, the report explains. 

‘Many Twitter customers reacted with insulting and demeaning language, comparable to telling him to “shut up” or “f*ck off”.’

Whereas these figures may sound low, these nonetheless equate to almost 60,000 tweets – a mean of 362 day-after-day.

Additional evaluation revealed that round one in 12 of those abusive tweets focused a participant’s race or gender.

Over the interval studied, 68 per cent of gamers acquired not less than one abusive tweet, whereas seven per cent acquired abuse day-after-day.

In the meantime, half of all of the abuse was focused at simply 12 gamers, who acquired a mean of 15 abusive tweets day-after-day.

See also  Electrical foiling raceboat takes flight for first time on River Po forward of its race debut in 2023

Cristiano Ronaldo topped the listing for the highest variety of abusive tweets (12,520), adopted by Harry Maguire (8,854) and Marcus Rashford (2,557).

Nonetheless, it was Harry Maguire who acquired the biggest share of abusive tweets (14.9 per cent), adopted by Frederico Rodrigues Santos (7.60 per cent) and Harry Kane (5.3 per cent).

Dr Bertie Vidgen, lead writer of the report and Head of On-line Security at The Alan Turing Institute mentioned: ‘These stark findings uncover the extent to which footballers are subjected to vile abuse throughout social media.

‘Outstanding gamers obtain messages from 1000’s of accounts day by day on some platforms.’

Based mostly on the findings, the researchers are calling on social media corporations to do extra to guard their customers.

‘Social media corporations needn’t wait for brand spanking new legal guidelines to make their websites and apps safer for customers,’ Mr Bakhurst mentioned.

‘Once we grow to be the regulator for on-line security, tech corporations should be actually open concerning the steps they’re taking to guard customers. We’ll count on them to design their providers with security in thoughts.’

In a separate ballot of the general public, Ofcom discovered that greater than a 3rd of followers who observe soccer (37 per cent) have seen abuse directed in direction of footballers.

Nonetheless, just one in 4 flagged or reported the abusive content material.

‘Supporters may play a constructive function in defending the sport they love,’ Mr Bakhurst concluded.

‘Our analysis reveals the overwhelming majority of on-line followers behave responsibly, and because the new season kicks off we’re asking them to report unacceptable, abusive posts at any time when they see them.’


Graphic violence and grownup content material

The corporate doesn’t permit individuals to put up graphic violence.

This may very well be any type of gory media associated to loss of life, severe damage, violence, or surgical procedures.

Grownup content material – that features media that’s pornographic and/or could also be supposed to trigger sexual arousal – can be banned.

Some type of graphic violence and grownup content material is allowed in Tweets marked as containing delicate media.

See also  How unhealthy your favorite meals are for the atmosphere

Nonetheless, these photographs will not be allowed in profile or header photographs.

Twitter might typically require customers to take away excessively graphic violence out of respect for the deceased and their households.

Illegal use

The platform shouldn’t be allowed for use to additional unlawful actions.


Customers will not be allowed to make use of badges, together with however not restricted to the ‘promoted’ or ‘verified’ Twitter badges, except supplied by Twitter.

Accounts utilizing unauthorised badges as a part of their profile images, header images, show names, or in any means that falsely implies affiliation with Twitter or authorisation from Twitter to show these badges, could also be suspended.


Customers might not purchase or promote Twitter usernames.

Username squatting – when individuals take the title of a trademark firm or a celeb – shouldn’t be allowed.

Twitter additionally has the suitable to take away accounts which are inactive for greater than six months.

Abusive behaviour

Context issues when evaluating for abusive behaviour and figuring out acceptable enforcement actions.

Components we might consider embrace whether or not the behaviour is focused at a person; the report has been filed by the goal of the abuse or a bystander or the behaviour is newsworthy and within the authentic public curiosity.

Customers might not make particular threats of violence or want for the intense bodily hurt, loss of life, or illness of a person or group of individuals.

This contains, however shouldn’t be restricted to, threatening or selling terrorism.

Customers might not promote or encourage suicide or self-harm. Customers might not promote baby sexual exploitation.

Customers might not direct abuse at somebody by sending undesirable sexual content material, objectifying them in a sexually specific method, or in any other case participating in sexual misconduct.

Customers might not use hateful photographs or symbols in your profile picture or profile header.

Non-public info

Customers might not publish or put up different individuals’s non-public info with out their specific authorisation and permission.

Customers might not put up or share intimate images or movies of somebody that had been produced or distributed with out their consent.

Customers might not threaten to show somebody’s non-public info or intimate media.

Supply: Twitter